Spacer

Showing posts with label Aceh elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aceh elections. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

For Aceh voters, one candidate is just as rotten as the other

Here’s the first report from our “average citizens” in Aceh whom I asked to tell me what people were saying about the candidates, and how they personally felt about both Prabowo and Jokowi.

Hi Ibu Sara--
 It is very difficult to make a decision for this election. Currently all media and social media are releasing black campaigns. To me this is really disgusting for a presidential election. Everyone claims that they are good candidates but actually they are not.

Currently in Aceh, the chief of Party Aceh declared that they will make Prabowo the president of Indonesia. According to rumors I read in the local Aceh newspaper a week ago, Party Aceh received one billion rupiah when they campaigned for the governor election and now Party Aceh will return it by campaigning for the Gerindra party for Prabowo to be the next Indonesian President. 

In Aceh, especially in Banda Aceh and Bireun, from my personal observation, people do not care about this election, even though Prabowo’s banner is everywhere and Prabowo visited Aceh last week for more campaigning. 

As far as “word on the street:” people are still confused about who to vote for.  There is no pressure yet from Party Aceh; everything looks calm still.  Neither candidate is who people in Aceh want. And at this time it seems that people are not frightened by Party Aceh for Prabowo [meaning there does not seem to be any voter intimidation yet].
  
I asked I. and S. and they both said they will not go to vote but will stay at their office on election day (July 9th).

You wrote, “Jokowi is rather weak and being controlled by Megawati, but he has a progressive agenda and is truly promoting diversity.  Prabowo is a war criminal whose supporters include very fundamentalist groups who do not believe in free speech or equality and are very much against the idea of Pancasila even though Prabowo says he supports it.” Although I hear these statements a lot on the street, I don’t know if they are true or not, because both of them claimed that they will do what they say (and I don’t trust this).

Overall from my personal opinion, both candidates will be very dangerous for the country and especially for Aceh. If Jokowi wins the election, people in Aceh say that Aceh province will be divided in 3 provinces, and t most of Aceh’s citizens do not want this to happen.  
If Prabowo wins the election, the GAM (Party Aceh) will have more power to control all of Aceh, and Aceh citizens will start complaining about this situation. 

I don’t know who I will vote for. I’m still waiting and seeing.  Currently I don’t like either.

Thanks Ibu Sara--

Thursday, April 24, 2014

PA intimidation at the polls: opposing party sour grapes, or the unfortunate truth?


I love an overview. And IPAC, the Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict, has come up with a corker: “Aceh’s Elections: A Do-it-yourself Analysis,” published on March 31, 2014.

If you’re still confused about who’s who, this document should help.

Granted, it’s a little like closing the barn door after the water buffalo has left, but reading this document in the context of what we know, or what is being reported, about election violence and fraud in certain dapil (voting districts), the not-yet-finalized reality is bearing out the assumptions made in the report. (National election results will be final May 9th.)

Plus, there is a handy fill-in-the-blank monitoring chart in the Appendix that lets you “compare the 2014 results to the legislative elections in 2009 and the gubernatorial election in 2012 in terms of the strength of Partai Aceh in each district.”

Yesterday I posted a press release from PNA outlining abuses and election fraud committed by Partai Aceh/PA [who are being courted by the Gerinda Party for support in the July presidential election]. Wanting to get both sides of the story, I went searching for similar reports, interviews or public statements made by PA members regarding their PNA opposition.  I could find very little.  People in Aceh also told me that it was common knowledge  that it was PA who “controlled” the elections (and the province) and they were doing everything they could to keep it that way, from intimidation to voter interference.  One citizen told me, “Everyone saw what was happening during the election with Partai Aceh, but nobody wanted to report it because of fear and the safety of themselves and their families. In some districts the number of abstentions was increased too. My personal opinion, this election is worse than last election period in Aceh. Fraud and intimidation was marked by PA.” 

This combined with the Probowa/Sharia love-fest does not bode well for the province. 

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

PNA Press Release Outlines Election Fraud and Corruption, and advocates for rejection of voting results


A friend who’s head of the Political and Peace Division of the Aceh National Party (Partai Nasional Aceh /PNA) forwarded me and some mutual colleagues a translation of PNA’s Press Release that states the reasons why it refuses to accept the result of the April 9th Legislative Election.

He writes, “Thanking you in advance for any action you can take in this matter towards improving the chances of successful democratization process in this post-conflict area where the peace process is supposed to be a model of successful post-conflict management.”

And here it is [with minor grammar edits].  Please read and share it.

 PNA WILL RESIST

The Partai Nasional Aceh (PNA) is a local party formed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) signed in Helsinki on August 15 2005 that ended the 30 year bloody conflict. It was formed by ex-GAM combatants, former peace negotiators in Helsinki, human rights/humanitarian/socio-political and women activists, intellectuals, religious leaders, and traders. It has continually tried to participate in the democratic political process within the frame of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in polite, civilized practices and law and order adherence at all times. However, during the period of this so-called “fiesta of democracy” in Aceh--the legislative election of April 9 2014-- this patient and restrained attitude was responded to with intimidation, oppression, cheating, atrocities and even assassinations by one of its local rival parties, aided by the machinery and leadership of the local government of Aceh and by the local electoral commission itself.

From the early days of its formation two years ago up to the days of the votes counting, PNA has registered all sorts of cheating and violent actions perpetrated against it by officials of the rival political party as well as by the electoral commission officers, including such acts as:

1. Murders of one of the ex-regional commanders of GAM who was at the forefront of the formation of the party, of a school teacher who had just announced his candidacy for the Aceh house of representatives (DPRA), of a campaigner who was lynched to death while drinking coffee at a well-known café in the middle of capital city of North Aceh, and of another while driving home in his car.  A female candidate had parked her car in the garage of her house when it was burnt down. Several other cars belonging to party campaigners were completely wrecked. Attempted arsons on offices and houses belonging to party official are common incidents. Such incidents continued till the vote counting days.

2. Intimidation of witnesses of PNA at vote counting centers, where the Party in power [PA, Partai Aceh] has strong influence, made it impossible for these witnesses to function and about a hundred of them had to resign, fearing the safety not only of themselves but also of their families;

3.  Intimidation and violence have been carried out systematically by the Party in power by instructing voters at the polling stations to vote for the party. Video recordings are available showing a truck painted with the colors of this party parked at a polling center and polling officials directing voters where to punch [their voting card]. When a reporter and cameraman working for a major British television station asked the policeman guarding the gate to the center why he allowed the car to be parked there, the policeman said: “They are on patrol.”  Upon being asked  about officials directing voters where to punch he said: “He was just trying to help.” Incidents like this are common, only not that many have been recorded by independent reporters.

4. KIP (Independent Electoral Commission) officials from the District/Town Councils all the way up to the Provincial levels, as well as staff carrying out various duties at the polling centers such as the PPK, PPS and the KPPS have been appointed by the Party in power through the DPRA (Aceh Parliament) controlled by the Partai Aceh, and some of them are openly members of the said party. Demands by other parties, local and national, that this appointment be done by the Central Electoral Commission, were ignored.

5. The mandates of the Electoral Control Commissions of Bawaslu and Panwas are deliberately not sanctioned by the Aceh Government, making them unable to function properly, especially when their assigned budgets and operational facilities were withdrawn by the Aceh Government.

6. The voting day itself was colored by massive fraud, whereby KPPS officials openly directed voters where to punch on the ballot papers. Witnesses could not function fully as pointed out above due to intimidation. Counting of votes and later the recapitulations processes were carried out behind closed doors, with the Government saying that these these processes are an internal matter of the government and that the public and the press would be given the official tallies when they were ready. On several occasions there were power outages at the centers, and the counting process was continued with light provided by small handheld flashlights. As vote counting continued non-stop all day and all night, many witnesses were too tired to continue and abandoned their posts. The electoral commission should have informed the participating parties of this possibility so that shift teams of witnesses could be arranged in advance.

7. The Aceh government’s partiality in favor of the Party in power at all levels of the province down to the sub-districts is openly practiced and well documented, including the use of public funds and facilities for the purpose of campaigning, issuing threats of dismissals to civil servants who would fail to carry out instruction to support the candidates of the Party in power, and awarding governmental cash grants for mosques and for village heads in front of the polling centers when people are queuing to vote.

8. Money politics are practiced not only in the form of donating campaign funds without proper documentation but paying cash to voters through village heads in what is known as “dawn attacks.”  


Based on the cited grave violations of all electoral rules cited above, the Aceh National Party does hereby state categorically and firmly that:

-- WE REJECT THE “PEMILU 2014” ELECTION, including all its results

-- WE WILL NO LONGER PARTICIPATE in future Pemilu electoral stages

-- We shall take all other possible and necessary actions to fight for the political rights and dignity of the Acehnese people

-- We shall conduct resistant actions and instruct all of PNA’s regional leaderships, cadres, members and those who sympathize with the Party to conduct actions of resistance at all levels as parts of our self-defense measures against tyrannical oppression.

We do hereby call on and urge all our pro-democracy friends and the media to help distribute this public statement as widely as possible, and we thank all in advance.

Banda Aceh, 19 April 2014

IRWANSYAH
Executive Chairman

Friday, April 18, 2014

Partai Aceh (PA) leading in election vote tally . . . so far


The Jakarta Post’s March 10 “Election Watch” department posts “Good prospects for national
parties in Aceh elections,” with PA sewing up victories in the northeast districts, including Aceh Timur.  The region remains home to a majority of ex-GAM combatants and it was on this land that the majority of the conflict—and the death and destruction—happened.

The PA victory lines up with what our guys-on-the-street have been telling us, despite PNA’s protests to the contrary.  Which is sort of sad.  Even though the choice is really between sad and sadder, when it comes to PA vs PNA.

People who spoke to the Post’s reporter predicted a not-so-overwhelming victory by PA this year, as opposed to the 60% they had in the previous election “because many party cadres in legislative and executive positions have forgotten their supporters,” referring to the poor conditions of the party’s grassroots followers and “the appalling state of the road leading to Cinta Raja [Aceh Tamiang].”

The article also quotes political leaders as reporting that PNA now has the majority of support, and that “almost 70 percent of ex-GAM combatants in the KPA [Aceh Transition Committee] and Aceh Party had jumped ship to the PNA.”   As we know, one of the cofounders of PNA is former Governor Irwandi Yusuf, now PNA Consultative Assembly Chairman.

“Chairman of the Aceh Party in Aceh Tamiang, Sahar, said although many ex-GAM members had turned to the PNA, the Aceh Party had not lost its relevance and the two parties would not sever relations. ‘Despite the differences in our visions, we remain brothers and will later develop a legislative coalition,’ he said.”

Well, that’ll be something to see.

I don’t know whether our JMD folks are just hearing the bellicose bloviating of Aceh Party Chairman and Deputy Governor Muzakir Manaf or if current vote counts (which are still not final) are actually bearing this out, but apparently PA is now in the lead as far as legislative seats go.  In written statements, “Muzakir emphasized the word ‘victory’. According to him, if the party failed, “Aceh will return to political darkness, leaving only a stretch of land at the tip of Sumatra without meaning and dignity.”   
And also without stoning, caning, or mandatory jilbabs.  Go figure.

See the full article at:

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The Indonesian elections: a little something for everyone


With the legislative elections only a day away I wanted to reprint what our new journalist friend Michael Bachelard wrote for the Sydney Morning Herald last week, based in part on his trip to Aceh, and assisted by—you guessed it—the staff of JMD.  Remember how a few months back I was posting about trying to find a journalist to do a “Where is Aceh 10 Years After the Tsunami” documentary, hopefully focusing on Aceh Timur, our cocoa farmers, and the fight to stop deforestation and big palm oil?  Well, I think Michael is going to do it.  He had a good if exhausting trip, saw lost of destruction he needed to see (but was sorry he had to) and spoke with politicians, our farmers and community members, and some ex-combatants and GAM leaders.  His focus this trip was on the elections, and I’m reprinting his article here (may he and the SMH forgive me for copyright infringement):

Indonesians vote one for incongruity
   ---Nowhere is the adage of politics makes strange bedfellows more apt

by Michael Bachelard, April 5, 2014


Running for office: the candidates. Photo: Fairfax Graphics

One-time nude model, polygamist and horror movie actress turned parliamentary candidate Angel Lelga smiles fetchingly for the camera as a succession of poor women move in to be photographed in her orbit.
They are standing on the verandah of a village house in Central Java, and Angel's immaculate make-up, pink Chanel slip-ons and high-fashion headscarf are incongruous among the chickens and dust of the rice belt.
Indonesia's parliamentary election is in full swing before the vote next Wednesday and campaign season makes for some odd sights. But the incongruities in Angel's candidacy do not end there - this celebrity entertainer with a past that is anything but orthodox is running for a conservative Muslim political party.
If elections, particularly those for a country's parliament, are a window to a nation's soul, there are some candidates who present a particularly complex and fascinating picture of the modern Indonesia.

Angel illustrates the mind-bending interface between religion, sex, morality and politics. She is running for the United Development Party (PPP), the oldest Islamic party in the country.

Its leader, religious affairs minister Suryadharma Ali, sits squarely on the right of national politics by pushing for Muslim morality to be embedded in law. In the past two years his party has suggested that alcohol be banned and that "skirts worn above the knee" be judged pornographic and thus illegal.

Yet it was Suryadharma himself who recruited Angel, whose naked torso graces an album cover by rock band Slank; who has acted in three lingerie-horror movies including The Moans of the Virgin Ghost with an American porn star; who converted from Catholicism to Islam just to become the fourth wife of a polygamous pop singer; and whose only previous political activism was chatting with the minister at parties.

Angel is one of a surprising large cohort of what the Indonesian blogosphere has derisively dubbed "caleg cantik", or beautiful candidates, recruited by a sclerotic party system for their vote-catching sex appeal. There are 50 or more running, prompting one commentator to bemoan a "bimbo time bomb" in the national parliament. In an interview as we bump along the roads of the town of Klaten, Angel asks only that we view her colourful past as part of her formation as a person.

She is in politics, she says, to reach out to more people, to have a useful life, to build villages. Why else would she run in what in Australian parlance we'd call a marginal, if not unwinnable, seat for PPP?
"If it is a difficult election to win, people will respect me more," she says.

But the contradictions embedded in her candidacy are obvious. She has begun wearing the headscarf but, asked if she would vote for her boss' mini-skirt ban, she equivocates.

"I don't want to oppose the views of Suryadarma Ali, but … we shouldn't be that narrow-minded."
On her Christian past, she insists it should not matter to Muslim voters "because religion should be personal". But she is running for a party whose reason for being is to put the religion into public policy. And in her spiel to villagers, she trumpets: "Do you want a non-Muslim running the country?"

Indonesia's sexual politics, though, are nothing if not complex. The message of political Islam may be straitlaced but a number of its politicians have been the "stars" of secret sex videos without apparent harm to their careers. Secret marriages, premarital sex and prostitution are widespread and tolerated.
Viewed in this light, Angel's many contradictions may be little more confounding than Indonesia itself.
Prita Mulyasari is also a celebrity candidate but her fame comes from social, not mass, media. A middle-class mother of three from Jakarta's outer suburbs, she was jailed in 2008 because she dared complain about her treatment in a hospital where her mumps were misdiagnosed as dengue fever.

After the hospital refused to admit its error or hand over her medical records, Prita's complaint via email went viral on social media. The symptoms of a sick health system were too familiar to many Indonesians.
The hospital's response was to sue for defamation. Police became involved and, on a visit to the prosecutor, Prita was informed that under Indonesia's electronic communications law she faced up to six years in jail, meaning she must be held in custody during the investigation.

Prita was whisked away immediately and put in a four metre square cell with 12 others including a murderer, a drug addict and a car thief. She spent a week in "quarantine", sleeping in shifts and unable to contact her family.
"I was shocked,'' she says. ''I never thought it would happen. I had done no preparation. My eldest child was two years old and the youngest eight months, and I was still breast feeding the baby … they would not even let me say goodbye to my kids.''
In total she was in jail for 22 days.

A likely explanation is that the hospital paid police and prosecutors in Indonesia's thoroughly corrupt legal system to throw the book at her. Judges are likewise able to be bought and Prita lost the case at the first hearing and was fined 200 million rupiah ($20,000).
"I felt I was facing giants," Prita says. "These people with unlimited money … they control the law."
In Prita's corner, though, was another feature of modern Indonesia - the power of social media. Jakartans tweet more than anybody else in the world, and Indonesia has the fourth largest Facebook population on the planet.

An appeal, "Coins for Prita", placed collection boxes around the country. So many coins were donated that she raised 800 million rupiah ($80,000). For four years she fought the hospital through various courts until a judicial review in 2012 found in her favour.
Megawati Sukarnoputri, chief of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), also lent her support, and now Prita is seeking election in the Banten III district outside Jakarta. Her hope is that, in parliament, she could see improvements in the defamation law, the health system, the legal system and prisons.
Nearly 2000 kilometres from Jakarta, Fadlon is a candidate in an electoral race that makes lesser men quail, and shows how politically pragmatic even former deadly enemies can be when resource exploitation is on the table.

Until 10 years ago, the GAM rebels of Aceh, Indonesia's westernmost province, waged a fierce war for independence. Fadlon, a former local commander who goes by just one name, is now seeking a provincial seat for Partai Aceh, the political party that emerged from GAM.
As a local party, Partai Aceh cannot contest seats in the national parliament, so since the 2009 election it has teamed up with a national party. This year, though, Fadlon's party has made the strangest possible choice of political partner - its one-time deadly enemy, former Indonesian general and Suharto son-in-law Prabowo Subianto.

According to University of California historian Geoffrey Robinson, Prabowo's command of reserve forces in the 1990s "coincided with the onset of the worst violence" in Aceh.
Now the former general is a credible candidate for the Indonesian presidency, and his party, Gerindra, desperately needs Acehnese votes. Last month, a former GAM leader, Aceh's deputy governor Muzakkir Manaf, made an agreement with Prabowo that some call a coalition, and he joined Gerindra's advisory board. He is telling Acehnese people to vote for Gerindra in parliament, and for Prabowo as president. Prabowo, in turn, apologised for army misbehaviour during the conflict.

But the tie-up - described by some as "like oil and water" - will sorely test even the most loyal Partai Aceh supporters in an electorate that is already tense after two candidates and several civilians have been killed in political violence in past weeks. Fadlon's uncle was shot dead by the army in the 1990s but, despite the qualms of his mother, he says he supports the Prabowo deal.
"We treated him as an enemy during the conflict but now we have a peace deal [with Jakarta signed in 2005], and he says he's committed to help build Aceh," Fadlon says. "I personally trust the elite of GAM on this."
What Prabowo has promised is a secret, but Partai Aceh wants what it has always wanted - Jakarta's hands off - particularly regarding the exploitation of its natural resources. Some suggest this is what Prabowo has offered.

"We want development, but we don't what to be dictated to by Jakarta," Fadlon says. "We were told by our elite that he is committed to this agreement."

Ordinary Partai Aceh supporters, though, find it hard to swallow. Jafaruddin sells fruit in the market in Kuala Simpang in Aceh's far south-east. A former combatant, his brother was one of those who disappeared.
"I would find it difficult personally to vote for [Prabowo] for president because our relatives were slaughtered by him … he was a murderer," Jafarruddin says.
Like Indonesia itself, though, he is complex, and he is inclined by habits of loyalty to do what his old commanders say, even though he believes if they saw him on the street "they would not even give me a cigarette butt".
"Yes, I still follow them," he says, "because that is our party."

Monday, April 7, 2014

Here are the students


Our foreign correspondent Wati takes her job very seriously!  I asked her to find out where the students were and what they were doing, and she tracked them to China, where they have been active in promoting non-discrimination as well as assisting Indonesians living and working there (and elsewhere) with voter registration so they can participate in the upcoming elections.  

Wati’s colleagues urge everyone to support PPI Tiongok (Perhimpunan Pelajar Indonesia --Indonesian Students’ Union) in their efforts to increase voter turnout in the 2014 elections.

For a look at what the students were doing in 1998, watch AKAR’s video of the protests and subsequent riots

The song is called "Dara Juang"/The Blood of Struggle

Here in our homeland
Where the rice fields lie before us
With the richness of its ocean
Our land is fertile, dear sir
In this beautiful country
(with) its millions of people 
The children of laborers do not go to school
The youth in our village are jobless
Their rights are stolen and they are hungry
Oh mother, let the blood of our struggle free the people
The youth in our village are jobless
Their rights are stolen and they are hungry
Oh mother, with the blood of our struggle, we promise you

Disini negri kami
Tempat padi terhampar
Samudranya kaya raya
Tanah kami subur tuan...
Dinegri permai ini
Berjuta Rakyat bersimbah rugah
Anak buruh tak sekolah
Pemuda desa tak kerja...
Mereka dirampas haknya Tergusur dan lapar bunda relakan darah juang kami tuk membebaskan rakyat...
Mereka dirampas haknya Tergusur dan lapar bunda relakan darah juang kami pada mu kami berjanji...

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Back to the Elections: Sharia Law as less-than-perfect Administrator


I promised you this post about three days ago . . . but life (and other Indonesian tidbits) intervened. (that line is from a poem but I cannot for the life of me remember it.) Anyway, this may be a two-post day.

Partai Aceh is using the implementation of Sharia Law in Aceh to further solidify a break with Indonesia by attempting to separate the constitution of Aceh from the national constitution.  I want to talk a little about the practicality of using Sharia law as not just the guide for but the basis of rules, regulations and policies that govern all parts of civil society and public services. I’ve had to rely on a few texts and lectures for this post, because even though I agree with what scholars and analysts have said, my initial reaction to any tiny group of people who hijack a faith for personal gain just makes me sputter incoherently, and I want to be a bit more coherent here.  And brief!  We don’t need another sleep-inducing pedantic tome on the vices or virtues of political Islam.

So here goes.

A government that wants to promote itself as “Islamist” first and foremost (as opposed to Democratic or Socialist or Monarchic etc.)  is going to run into some difficulty because it must stretch itself across all areas of life, not just religious/spiritual practice.  It immediately inherits responsibilities that as a faith it has never been established to address.  And Islam has never been a homogenous entity (this is especially evident in Indonesia with all its different factions).

Sami Zubaida, in his book Beyond Islam, writes that both the West and Islam “comprise a great diversity of cultures, social formations and political organizations historically and now.
There is a great deal in common for example, between conservative Islamic advocacy in the Middle East and that of the US religious right. Both advocate the supremacy of revelation over science, the moralization of society, and the regulation and censorship of cultural products. [my emphasis.]
“To see Islamic law as one immutable set of norms, then, is difficult in light of the contemporary and concrete problems of governance, economic development, opportunity, social services, security, international relations, trade, etc.  In an earlier post I quoted Bertrand Russell, who said that his main gripe with Communism was its reliance on a tiny number of self-described “elites” who make decisions and force their vision of change onto a “recalcitrant majority.” 
Likewise, Sharia law i is guilty of this technical failure to address those specific areas of governance that deal with civil society, and this failure makes the idea of parliamentary or legislative power (or importance) pretty absurd.

In 1988 Ayatollah Khomeini issued his famous fatwa on maslahat (public interest), maintaining that "[The Islamic state] is the branch of the absolute trusteeship of the Prophet and constitutes one of the primary ordinances of Islam which has precedence over all derived ordinances, such as prayer, fasting, and pilgrimage." In other words, the existence of this Islamic government is more important than any thing else we have in our legal tradition. So Islamic law is what characterizes a community and is what legitimizes its claim to power.

But Khomeni also says that actually being in power is more important than Islamic law. Our being in power allows us, and actually necessitates us, to suspend or contradict any notion in Islamic law if we deem it necessary. So this concept of “maslaha” or “utility” or “public interest,” says Zubaida, “has been advocated at various times as a let-out clause for policy and legislation."

Efraim Afsah of the University of Copenhagen sums it up like this: "Those now actually in power have to figure out how to derive public law and policy from a body of work that has been developed by private individuals, (which is how Islamic law began), that is focused on private law and private transactions, is highly formalistic, very inflexible, with very strong emphasis on procedural matters, and that is now being used to run the public sphere. And they have to derive public law from this. [Sharia law] simply does not provide the answers in all the fields that a modern government is faced with. That is the practical challenge.”

The body of Islamic law is said by its proponents to be complete (or as Zubaida says, “a total 'civilization', not just a religion but a political and social system, and the divinely revealed law at its core"). But it has no conceptual answers to practical problems. It does not have rules for governance, or “secondary rules:” rules about how to assess when new rules need to be made, no instruments of governance or civil law in place and ready for new leaders.

Also, a massive degree of violence has been needed to push through Islamist reform efforts in a great many countries, not just Indonesia, and not just against a secular opposition but violence against otherwise sympathetic people who are often trained in religious law and who may disagree on minor points. And that again points to the absence of these “secondary rules,” for example, the rule of recognition:  How does a member of society recognize that a rule is valid? There are no clear means of doing this.
The rule of change: How do I change rules that are no longer practical? With Sharia this is a big problem because rules, once they exist, once they find themselves in one of the many fiqh manuals, are very hard to change.
And then there’s the rule of Adjudication: How do I deal with two competing rules? How do I decide which rule takes precedence? There are no methodological norms to solve this; if there were, there would be no need to use violence against people who have different opinions.

This method of using a state apparatus to bend reality to conform to ideological preferences is what is at the heart of the “enactment” of Sharia law.  But what’s so awful about its application in Aceh is that those who are promoting it have either not thought through its devastating consequences based on its own inability to respond to the practical realities of the majority of Acehnese citizens . . . or, since they are only interested in the political results Sharia will yield for them, they simply do not care.  And I fear it is the latter.