Spacer

Monday, June 16, 2014

Prabowo's Christian brother and major campaign financer is not too happy!


Okay, okay, I know I said I’d stop doing election commentary, but things just keep getting more and more surreal in the mother of all bizarre presidential races.  Probowo’s brother Hashim Djojohadikusumo, who is also his business partner and bankroll, is a Christian, bless him, and is a little peeved that Prabowo has accepted the support of   the Islamic Defenders Front/ FPI, those thuggish enemies of religious tolerance—which of course has Prabowo equivocating all over the place and Hashim madly trying to spin it to sound as if Prabowo has no real knowledge that any of his “thousands” of supporters is not on board with Pancilla. 

Can it get any more slimy?

Why yes, it can—if Prabowo’s followers continue to place their faith in him as a leader.  A country gets the leadership it deserves . . . unless of course they get the leadership that somebody bought for them.

Indonesia: Controversial alliances open rifts in Prabowo presidential campaign

Pacific Scoop:Analysis – By Patrick Tibke in Jakarta

June 12, 2014


An intriguing 10 days of presidential campaigning in Indonesia has culminated in mild disarray for Prabowo Subianto’s “red-and-white” coalition as tensions emerged among senior members of the old general’s Gerindra party with just four weeks left until election day on July 9.
The contention in question is the coalition’s nascent alliance with a grouping of violent thug organisations, particularly the Front Pembela Islam (Islamic Defenders Front, of FPI), which is well-known for attacks on Indonesia’s religious minorities and so-called tempat maksiat (places of vice or iniquity).

Prabowo and his running mate Hatta-Rajasa’s willingness to get into bed with some of Indonesia’s most notorious radical Islamists has called into question the duo’s commitment to religious tolerance and human rights. Prabowo has been accused of tacitly condoning violent bigotry and turning a blind eye to religiously-motivated attacks on Indonesian citizens.
The most conspicuous cleavage has pitted Prabowo’s billionaire younger brother and deputy chief patron, Hashim Djojohadikusomo, against author and deputy chairman of Gerindra, Fadli Zon. Evidently dismayed by the possibility of his brother’s party courting an alliance with known Islamic radicals, Hashim has pledged to quit Gerindra if the movement ever accepted the backing of the FPI.

As a practising Christian, Hashim seems acutely aware of the threat to religious freedoms posed by the thug collective, and has sought to distance both himself and his party from any such pact with the FPI. Hashim has taken a strong stance on this particular issue for quite some time now, and even cited “growing religious intolerance” as one of three “urgent threats” to Indonesia’s future in an article for the Huffington Post earlier this year.

These sentiments were reiterated by Hashim at the Jakarta Foreign Correspondents club late last week, where the businessman cum big-money politician also attempted to take the flak off his older brother’s back, assuring his audience that Prabowo “has been defending Pancasila and pluralism all his life.” [editor’s note: Bwahahahahahahaha!]

Both domestic and international media remain unconvinced, however, and key Gerindra party figures such as Fadli Zon have done little to quell the fears of Indonesia’s persecuted minorities.
Worryingly indifferent
So far Fadli has adopted a worryingly indifferent attitude towards serious accusations that his coalition is currently pandering to religious extremists. Last Wednesday, for example, Fadli proclaimed that Gerindra welcomes political support from any group, nonchalantly adding that the FPI is just “one organisation” among “thousands” of others who lend their support to Gerindra “every day”.

Without even a hint of concern, Fadli also dodged questions on the FPI’s back catalogue of religious violence, telling reporters that, “We [Gerindra] do not talk about track records, we talk about the presidential election.”

Consequently, two of the most senior members of Prabowo’s entourage now appear to be at loggerheads. Prabowo seems to have firmly sided with the FPI already, rendering Hashim’s threat of resignation somewhat unsubstantiated, to say the least.

Since entering into the much-condemned electoral pact with the FPI just before horrific mob attacks on Christian minorities in Yogyakrta at the end of last month, Prabowo’s public rhetoric has been conspicuously inconsistent, incorporating an unworkable mixture of both Fadli’s indifference and Hashim’s concern.

On Tuesday, May 27, at a meeting with FPI members and the group’s grand imam, Rizieq Shibab, Prabowo spoke of the need to “embrace all community organisations, including the FPI.” Just one week later, however, Prabowo was under pressure to give censure to the attacks in Yogyakarta, claiming that, “We [the 'red-and-white' coalition] do not justify violence of any sort, let alone unlawful attacks on [different] ethnicities, religions or other groups.”
If this was true then we could expect to see Prabowo explicitly pulling out of his alliance with the FPI, but the embattled old general has stuck his newfound pact and merely tried limit the damage done to his campaign by shifting the blame onto the radicals themselves.

On Thursday, June 5, for example, a spokesperson for the red-and-white coalition, Bara Hasibuan, told the media, “It wasn’t us looking for the support of the FPI, but it was they who came to a religious gathering to offer their support to Prabowo and Hatta.”

Teetering on edge
The Gerindra-led coalition now appears to be teetering on the edge of a major internal breakdown as it flip-flops on important issues of religious violence and refuses to rescind its alliance with the FPI. Fadli Zon has since tried to limit the impact of Gerindra’s infighting by characterising religious conflict as something which the party needn’t have an official stance on: “We have private opinions”, he told reporters last week, “and we have the opinions of the [campaign] team. Differences in opinion are just normal.”

Hashim, on the other hand, has attempted to execute a sort of smoke-and-mirrors manoeuvre in claiming that he would quit the party if and when it agrees to accept an endorsement from the FPI, when in actual fact, Gerindra already accepted that endorsement almost two weeks ago, and the FPI is not shying away from making the agreement public. Last week, for example, an FPI representative for Central Java promised 10,000 votes for Prabowo-Hatta from FPI sympathizers in his province, based on the ‘red-and-white’ coalition’s perceived “commitment” to Islamic law.
Gerindra’s stance on Islamic fundamentalism and the violence which typically accompanies its advocates remains incredibly obscure, all the more so considering Hashim’s vocal rejection of any such alliance with the FPI. The only thing that we can say for sure is that Prabowo is looking ever more desperate to garner votes from all sources in the final stages of the campaign season, and is evidently willing to work with some of Indonesia’s most reviled Islamists in order to augment his chances of victory.

As we have seen over the past week or so, however, such dangerous politicking could have serious unintended repercussions for Gerindra’s intra-party relations, and the fissures could well expand beyond Hashim and Fadli to other cadres much less senior in rank. In the coming days we will see how Prabowo attempts to patch this one up, lest he risk creating a rift between himself, his deputy chairman and his indispensible sibling bankroller, Hashim.

Patrick Tibke writes for Asian Correspondent.

Friday, June 13, 2014

If Prabowo is elected . . . how will the White House address his invitations to state dinners?


At this point, additional re-posting of the ever-lengthening line of Prabowo’s dirty laundry almost seems like kicking a puppy.  (Almost, but not quite.So I’ll sum up one more 3-day media fest and then move on—or rather, back—to Aceh and JMD’s cocoa improvement project, which as of this month heads into its second year of assistance by the Embassy of Finland, which will hopefully put this small but determined rainforest-based association on the cocoa producing map. Then maybe finally we will get a little respect from those large donors and cocoa producing companies who talk a good game about “fair trade” and “certified organic” but can never seem to answer basic questions like “where exactly are your farmers located,” and “how do you determine what is ‘fair’ and what is ‘organic’”? and “do you know for certain that any of your farms ever get monitored?”

But for now . . .
Back to the ringside seat, right outside the bag, where the cat was let out about a week ago and now Prabowo is defending himself to every media source imaginable, including last week’s debates, where in answer to a pointed question from opposing VP Candidate Kalla about his involvement in 1998 war crimes in locations including Aceh and East Timor, he said  “I am a former soldier who has done his duty as best as I can. Aside from that, it is up to the judgment of my superiors.”
When he finally twigged to the fact that the public was beginning to see him as a gross violator of human rights (see, he’s quick like that) he announced:  “I am the toughest human-rights defender in the republic.”

Then the Jakarta Post re-printed the story of the leaked documents and a prior interview with Prabowo (remember his “I am not a crook, I was framed, they all hate me” interview a few weeks back?) in which he admitted to just a little bit of kidnapping, but he was under orders . . .  which REALLY ticked off those in the political know who were around during both Sukarno and Suharto’s presidencies and even despite their distaste for one or the other president, think that Prabowo has stooped to a new low to hide behind either.

Prabowo supporters think it’s all a big “smear campaign” to discredit their candidate.  Indeed, he does still seem to have supporters, if attendance at recent rallies is any indicator.

It floors me, it really does.  What will it take for people to realize that one of their presidential candidates is an unapologetic monster?  Sure, we have unapologetic monsters all the time in politics, but this is as creepy as something like serial killer Charles Manson still having delusional groupies after 40 years in prison, only Prabowo’s followers are not a ragtag bunch of fruit loops.

See? This is what poverty, and frustration, and sexual repression, and yes, civil rights abuse creates: a group of people so angry they have lost sight of anything having to do with peace and justice and the future.  It makes sense that Prabowo would harness their dark energy.  For a “former soldier,” there is no future, there is only one continuous, painful, bloody present, with the enemy everywhere, the reward forgotten.

Prabowo ‘ordered by Soeharto  to kidnap activists’
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/06/11/prabowo-ordered-soeharto-kidnap-activists.html

Presidential candidate Prabowo Subianto reportedly revealed that former president Soeharto ordered him to kidnap pro-democracy activists in May 1998, which saw him dismissed from the Indonesian Military (TNI), according to Veterans Association (Pepabri) chairman Gen. (ret) Agum Gumelar.

“Prabowo told me when he visited Pepabri recently, that he was ordered by former president Soeharto to kidnap the activists. I was quite shocked, because he didn’t say anything about that when the [TNI] Officers Honorary Council [DKP] questioned him,” he said in a live TV interview on Tuesday.

Agum acknowledged he was skeptical about the statement as he knew Soeharto would not have ordered something so controversial during a chaotic time, even though Prabowo was then Soeharto’s son-in-law.

Agum attended the live TV interview to answer questions regarding the reasons behind Prabowo’s 
dismissal from the TNI — a topic that emerged during Monday evening’s live presidential candidate debate when rival vice presidential candidate Jusuf Kalla asked the question.

In his response, Prabowo answered: “I am a former soldier who did his duty as best as I could. Aside from that, it’s up to the judgment of my superiors.” 

“I am the toughest human-rights defender in the republic,” he added.

His tone rose noticeably when Kalla pushed him to elaborate on incidents surrounding the fall of Soeharto in May 1998. 

However, a leaked document circulated on the Internet recently detailing the reasons behind the dismissal of Prabowo from military service on Aug. 21, 1998. It cast doubt on the former general’s suitability to serve as president, if elected on July 9.

The document — which was a scanned copy of the official letter signed by members of the DKP tasked with hearing the case of Prabowo’s complicity in the kidnapping of pro-democracy activists in 1998 — revealed that the former Army’s Special Forces (Kopassus) commander was also fired from his position due to insubordination.

The signatories in the document were DKP chairman Gen. Subagyo Hadi Siswoyo, who was also the Army chief of staff; secretary Lt. Gen. Djamari Chaniago; Lt. Gen. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, now the incumbent President; Lt. Gen. Fachrul Razi; Lt. Gen. Yusuf Kartanegara; Lt. Gen. Arie J. Kumaat; and Lt. Gen. Agum Gumelar.

Agum said the leaked document, including the other violations Prabowo was said to have committed, was valid. 

He acknowledged Prabowo was an undisciplined soldier during the time, citing the activists’ kidnapping as one of his violations where he ignored orders from his superiors.

The issues surrounding Prabowo’s controversial past have recently emerged due to public pressure, which forced the General Elections Commission (KPU) to agree to the demand to include human rights in the broad topic of democracy and legal certainty in the first presidential candidate debate.

Prabowo’s supporters deem accusations regarding the presidential candidate’s track record as part of a smear campaign to dent his popularity. 

On Aug. 25, 1998, The Jakarta Post reported that the Armed Forces (ABRI, as the TNI was then known) honorably discharged then Lt. Gen. Prabowo Subianto and removed two senior Kopassus officers from active duty as punishment for their role in the abduction and torture of political activists.

The ABRI also announced Prabowo was entitled to his pension, but said he could face a military tribunal in the future if more damning evidence of his involvement in the kidnappings was discovered.

In front of local and foreign journalists at the Armed Forces’ Merdeka Barat headquarters in Central Jakarta, then minister of defense and security and ABRI commander Gen. Wiranto announced the decision, which was issued on the recommendation of the DKP that had investigated the abductions.

“My decision regarding Lt. Gen. Prabowo is to end his active service with the Armed Forces. Prabowo is no longer included in any ABRI structure. He is a civilian now,” Wiranto said at the time.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Prabowo’s 1998 military dismissal re-examined, and it’s not pretty


ETAN (East Timor and Indonesia Action network) tweeted this Jakarta Post story yesterday.  I was beginning to wonder if any civil society organizations were on the ball re: Prabowo’s campaign and the international nap that has taken place regarding it, despite his overseeing of brutal repression in both Aceh and East Timor.

You KNOW a guy’s bad news when he’s fired for human rights violations by one of the organizations that helped write the book on torture and genocide.

Fresh doubt cast on Prabowos suitability to rule

A leaked document circulating on the Internet detailing the reasons behind the dismissal of presidential candidate Prabowo Subianto from military service on Aug. 21, 1998, has cast doubts on the former general
s suitability to serve as president, if elected on July 9.

The document, which was a scanned copy of the official letter signed by members of the Indonesian Military
s (TNI) Officers Honorary Council (DKP) tasked with hearing the cases of Prabowo’s complicity in the kidnapping of pro-democracy activists in 1998, revealed that the former Army Special Forces (Kopassus) commander was also fired from his position due to insubordination.

Signatories in the document include then Lt. Gen. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, the current President; then Army chief of staff Gen. Soebagyo Hadi Siswoyo; Lt. Gen. Fachrul Razi; and Lt. Gen. Agum Gumelar.

If the authenticity of the document is verified, it could deal a blow to Prabowo
s credibility as a military man and presidential candidate.

The document states Prabowo, as Kopassus commander, overstepped his authority by ordering the Mawar and Melati units to arrest and detain the activists of the radical People
s Democratic Party (PRD).

Mawar and Melati are military units under the command of Kopassus, which answer to the commander of the TNI.

However, the document reveals the Mawar unit did not act on its own initiative, like Prabowo
s campaign team have repeatedly claimed.

The document suggests the Mawar unit carried out the kidnappings after Prabowo reassured them that it
had been reported and that the operation was based on a direct order from on high, when in fact a report was never made by Prabowo to then Indonesian Armed Forces (or ABRI, as the TNI was then known) commander Gen. Wiranto.

The kidnapping was only reported in April 1998 after pressure from then head of the Armed Forces Intelligence Body (BIA) Maj. Gen. Zacky Anwar Makarim.

The document, which was uploaded on the website indonesia-2014.com, is the first document made public that details how Prabowo was dismissed from the military.

The document states the DKP not only dismissed Prabowo on charges of human rights violations in relation to the abductions, but also on a number of other actions that demonstrated his insubordination and disregard for the military code.

Among the other charges brought against him in the DKP hearing were that Prabowo had carried out or had taken over several operations that were under the authority of the ABRI commander, including the involvement of military forces in East Timor (now Timor Leste) and Aceh; the release of hostages in Wamena in then-Irian Jaya; and Kopassus
involvement in securing president Soehartos visit to Vancouver, Canada in 1997, shortly before the strongman was ousted from power.

In conclusion, the DKP said Prabowo had disgraced and disregarded the military system and committed a criminal offense.

In response to the circulating document, the leader of the Prabowo-Hatta Rajasa election campaign team, Mahfud MD, reiterated that Prabowo was honorably discharged from the military.

Pak Prabowo did receive his marching orders, but take note that he was discharged with respect,” Mahfud told reporters at Polonia House in East Jakarta.

There is no problem with this document circulating, I want to emphasize it [the dismissal] was done with respect. It would only be a problem if he were dishonorably discharged, the former Constitutional Court chief justice said.
 
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/06/09/fresh-doubt-cast-prabowo-s-suitability-rule.html

Wati Calls the Election . . .

Wati’s correspondence over the past few days has been rather despairing, but she’s perked up considerably since last night’s presidential debates, in which Jokowi apparently did well, while Prabowo . . . not so much.   

Going into the debates, Wati was thinking that she was one of the reported 40% “swing voters . . .“ until she heard Prabowo invoke the name of Sukarno for his own benefit :“And when in his speech Prabowo said "on behalf of Soekarno. . . : slip of the tongue? more likely of his spirit.  To me, this is proof that he believes that “the end justifies the means" ie.  at the lowest point  in a person’s integrity.”
 
Then she reported that Prabowo had received support from FPI, Front Pembela Islam/ Islamic Defenders Front, a truly charming paramilitary “religious” group that is so vile, thuggish and hate-based that nearly everyone in Indonesia wants them banned.   So, good on you, there, Prabowo.  However: think of what that would mean if he were elected. The Jakarta Post simultaneously printed an article called “Pluralism in Peril,” citing an invitation for political leaders to a  meeting in a mosque in Gedhe Kauman, Yogya “to urge the Muslim community to unite to fight against pluralism."  Because differing opinions require so much more silencing, don’t you know.

Watil also showed me an email from a friend who says “I had lunch with our mutual friend Bu Mara and was surprised when she said that she supports Prabowo. I immediately kept my big mouth shut! She assured us that P is a changed man, he is really passionate to take Indonesia to the next level (or the lower level, ya?). When asked about the rumor that he is courting Widyawati (the ex movie star) to be his wife, she said that's not true. She thinks that P will win. Gosh it is indeed scary. He is a good speaker though-- as I listened to his first speech after being confirmed as the presidential candidate. Jokowi on the other hand still trying to portray the rakyat (trying to show he’s a man of the people) and is too simple for a Capres/candidate.
So our hope is still dim.

So it was looking grim until the first debate, where Wati reported that “to my surprise Jokowi did very well. Not only in his answers, but also he and Jusef Kalla (running mate) wore black suits with red ties and wore no "pici" while Prabowo and Hatta Rahardja wore white (as in Muslim) shirts and pants with "pici."


Indonesia’s vice presidential candidate Hatta Rajasa (L) greets presidential candidate Joko Widodo (2nd L), while presidential candidate Prabowo Subianto (2nd R) greets vice presidential candidate Jusuf Kalla, before their presidential debate in Jakarta on June 9.    Reuters

“Jokowi looked sophisticated --far from being a "country bumpkin" like his opponents called him.
With confidence he elaborated his achievements as mayor in Solo and as governor in Jakarta.
Most important was when he stated that "Bhineka Tunggal Ika" or unity in diversity is FINAL, this could no longer be a matter for discussion as this was the foundation of our founding fathers when they fought and declared Indonesia’s independence.
He gave an example of this: when as Jkt governor he chose Susan, a Chinese and Christian woman to be a "lurah" in Lenteng Agung, whose majority of residents are Muslim.
There have been demonstrations and protests against his decision but he stood by it, as she is indeed a capable person.

Prabowo did poorly tonight. So as one of the 40% swing voters I might "ignore" JK’s sins and cast my vote for Jokowi...?!”

And there you have it!

See also the Wall Street Journal:

and the Jakarta Post:

Friday, June 6, 2014

Myanmar’s treatment of the Rohingya: an “affront to civilization”


The New York Times has been providing fairly steady reporting on the atrocities suffered by the Rohingya in Myanmar (see Jane Perlez’ May 2 article, “Death Stalks Muslims as Myanmar Cuts Off Aid” which provides another harrowing overview of the continued persecution of this stateless minority. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/03/world/asia/death-stalks-muslims-as-myanmar-cuts-off-aid.html?_r=0)
But as with the poorest of the poor in Aceh province, the Rohingya’s plight has not drawn sufficient global attention for Myanmar to change its draconian policies towards this group.
Myanmar, a Buddhist-majority country, keeps many Rohingya Muslims in quasi-concentration camps.  Credit Video Frame Grab by Adam Ellick/The New York Times

Ever since 2009 when I traveled with JMD to Aceh Timur’s coast to set up a makeshift camp for the over 200 Rohingya who had landed on Aceh’s shore (several hundred more had reached—and been turned away from—Thailand and Bangladesh; Indonesia, especially Aceh, was one of the few places to welcome them) I have been urging US and international bodies to address what is basically genocide by default.  But since the world wants to praise Myanmar for the strides it has taken since becoming a democracy, it has pretty much given it a pass for its continued human rights violations of Rohingya, elaborately and chillingly spelled out in a 78-page 2014 report called Policies of Persecution by the group Fortify Rights (ww.fortifyrights.org).  I hope you click on the link (in the” Rohingya News” section on the right hand column of this blog) and read this document.

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristoff wrote both a follow-up on this story and an op-ed, which urged President Obama to “find his voice” and speak out against suffering that is  deliberately inflicted as government policy, “which he calls an “affront to civilization.”

I do not know if the recent increase in articles concerning the Rohingya will effect any positive or immediate change in Myanmar’s current policy.  As I have noted before, in letters to my Senators, Congresspeople, and Secretary of State, human rights violations are measured, by my government anyway, based on the amount of economic investment we have with the particular violator. 

Little current economic or political benefit  (Ukraine) = large scale suffering and subjugation must be stopped!
Lots of economic, trade, and geopolitical positioning at stake (Aceh, Myanmar) = oh, it’s not that bad.  Those Rohingya—what a bunch of complainers!

Let me tell you, I would pack up JMD’s  staff today and head for one of those camps, but we are not allowed in there to help.

The persecution of the Rohingya is nothing less than institutionalized torture.  Countries, including the US, treat their marginalized citizens like crap all the time.  But as Kristoff points out, this in a far more insidious injustice which, if we sit idly by because Myanmar is getting “some” of its democracy right, is about as big a crime against humanity as we can commit. He writes, “I do wonder about the fairness of highlighting crimes against humanity in one state of the country, when there’s great progress in the country economically, politically and socially. Yet these are the kinds of crimes that merit priority; they shouldn’t be excused because there’s progress in other areas.”

Kids are not allowed to go to school in the camps; some older children try to set up “schools” for the younger ones.

In his May 31 article “With the Rohingya in Myanmar,” Kristoff reports that no aid workers are allowed in the Rohingya camps, and Rohingya are not allowed to leave, except with special “passes:”

Since violent clashes in 2012, the Rohingya have been confined to quasi-concentration camps or to their villages, denied ready access to markets, jobs or hospitals. This spring, the authorities expelled the aid group Doctors Without Borders, which had been providing the Rohingya with medical care. Orchestrated violent attacks on the offices of humanitarian organizations drove many aid workers away as well and seemed intended in part to remove foreign witnesses to this ethnic cleansing.

In one internment camp Kristoff and his intern found “dangerous tension and some malnutrition, but by far the biggest problem is medical care. More than one million Rohingya are getting little if any health care, and some are dying as a result.”
Hussein says his arm was broken by a Buddhist mob two years ago. It is now useless because he never saw a doctor to re-set the bone. Credit Nicholas Kristof/The New York Times

 

Kristoff’s  same-day follow-up article is re-printed below.

 

Obama Success, or Global Shame?

President Obama, in his address a few days ago at the United States Military Academy at West Point, cited Myanmar as one of the administration’s diplomatic successes. It’s true that Myanmar has made tremendous political gains in recent years — the permission I received to report here is testimony to that — and there is much to admire about the country’s progress toward democracy. But let’s not make excuses for a 21st-century apartheid worse even than the system once enforced in South Africa. As Human Rights Watch has documented, what has unfolded here constitutes ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
Likewise, another watchdog group, Fortify Rights, cites internal Myanmar documents and argues that a pattern over the years of killings, torture, rape and other repression amounts to crimes against humanity under international law.
Weighed against such abuses, Obama’s criticisms of Myanmar have been pathetically timid. Because he is hugely admired here, Obama has political capital to pressure the government that he has not used. Indeed, the United States and other countries have often even avoided the word Rohingya, effectively joining in the denial of a people’s identity. That’s a failed policy, for this deference has led Myanmar to tighten the screws on the Rohingya this year.
The Rohingya gave us the names of some Buddhists who they said had been leaders in slaughtering Muslims, and we visited one of these men they named. A 53-year-old farmer, he denied any involvement in the violence, but it was an awkward, tense conversation, partly because the Buddhists are angry at aid groups and journalists for (as they see it) siding with Muslims. Their narrative is that Muslim terrorists from Bangladesh are invading the country, overpopulating so as to marginalize the Buddhists, and then being coddled by foreigners.
The extremists back up this absurd narrative with intimidation. My Buddhist driver, who sported a nationalist tattoo, was willing to take me into Rohingya camps and villages and had no fear of assault by Muslims. But he was terrified of going to some hard-line Buddhist areas, for fear that we would be assaulted as Muslim sympathizers.
When the authorities found out that we were wandering in the hills, they sent a team of police officers armed with automatic weapons to find and “protect” us. They need to start protecting the Rohingya as well.
Look, I’ve seen greater malnutrition and disease over the years — in South Sudan, Niger, Congo, Guinea — but what’s odious about what is happening here is that the suffering is deliberately inflicted as government policy. The authorities are stripping members of one ethnic group of citizenship, then interning them in camps or villages, depriving them of education, refusing them medical care — and even expelling and even expelling humanitarians who seek to save their lives. 
That’s not a tragedy for one obscure ethnic group; it’s an affront to civilization. Please, President Obama, find your voice.